ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2026
Inpatient Satisfaction at Indian Health Service Hospitals.
Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAmerican Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations receive care through multiple healthcare systems, including the Indian Health Service (IHS), which provides care to nearly two million users. To better understand inpatient quality of care, we examined patient satisfaction at IHS hospitals and assessed whether operation of IHS hospitals under self-determination contracts or compacts was associated with higher satisfaction than federally operated IHS hospitals.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) data from October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2023. We evaluated top-box responses for nurse communication, physician communication, and overall hospital rating from 9642 surveys across 22 IHS hospitals. 19 of the 22 hospitals (86%) were located in non-metropolitan counties defined by US census tracts classified as rural or isolated rural by Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes. Multilevel logistic regression clustered by hospital examined associations with tribal operation of IHS hospitals, region, county poverty rate, and Area Deprivation Index.
findingsHospital-level averages for all HCAHPS measures were lower for IHS hospitals than the national HCAHPS average. Tribal operation of IHS hospitals was associated with higher odds of top-box overall hospital rating (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.04-1.94) but not with nurse or physician communication. Physician communication scores were inversely associated with area deprivation. Substantial variation existed across IHS regions.
conclusionIHS hospitals demonstrated lower satisfaction scores than the national average, with wide variability across facilities. Tribal operation of IHS hospitals was associated with higher overall hospital ratings, suggesting potential benefits of local governance. Findings highlight opportunities to strengthen patient experience across the IHS and the value of examining high-performing hospitals to inform improvement efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.