ReviewCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2026
Crosstalk Between Cortical Plasticity and Peripheral Nervous Injury: Insights, Mechanisms, and Future Directions.
Review in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCortical plasticity is essential for functional recovery after peripheral nervous injury (PNI). Different injury types, from compressive to metabolic neuropathies, lead to distinct patterns of cortical reorganization, calling for a better understanding of the mechanisms and treatment options for each injury type.
methodsThis review summarizes current evidence from preclinical, neuroimaging, electrophysiological, and clinical studies on the link between cortical plasticity and PNI.
resultsThe review describes the key molecular pathways that shape adaptive and maladaptive cortical reorganization across injury types, examines the value of neuroimaging and blood-based biomarkers for tracking plasticity, and evaluates the current evidence for drug and rehabilitation treatments. Major gaps remain, including the limited testing of biomarkers across different injury types, the lack of PNI-specific clinical trials, and the difficulty of applying laboratory findings to personalized treatment.
conclusionsMoving forward, progress depends on validating biomarkers for each injury type, conducting well-designed trials in PNI patients, and combining drug, rehabilitation, and whole-body treatment approaches. This review offers a practical guide for turning mechanistic knowledge into clinical focus in PNI-related cortical plasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.