ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026
Decision-Making Around Preimplantation Genetic Testing by Individuals With Neurofibromatosis Type I: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic conditions (PGT-M) with in vitro fertilization (IVF) is a reproductive technology that reduces the chance of passing down known genetic variants to future children. While prior research has explored reproductive decision-making for individuals with neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1), few studies describe the factors that influence their choices to pursue or not pursue IVF with PGT-M. Adults with NF1 in the United States who had received reproductive counseling around IVF with PGT-M were recruited from the Children's Tumor Foundation NF Registry. We conducted virtual semi-structured qualitative interviews that assessed participants' reproductive choices and lived experiences in the context of NF1. Transcripts were de-identified, coded, and thematically analyzed using the Framework Method. Coding matrices were created to synthesize data and generate themes. We interviewed 20 individuals with NF1: 12 who pursued and 8 who did not pursue IVF with PGT-M. Four key themes emerged around reproductive decision-making: (1) Personal values and preferences, (2) Practical considerations, (3) Input from others, and (4) Retrospective feelings and future considerations. The choice of whether to pursue IVF with PGT-M for NF1 is a personal and nuanced decision affected by the emotional, financial, and time commitments of IVF with PGT-M. During counseling, clinicians should consider a patient's family history of NF1 and address the clinical variability of NF1 to facilitate reproductive decision-making. Many participants reported increased neurofibroma growth during IVF or pregnancy and expressed concerns about undergoing IVF or carrying future pregnancies due to this perceived risk. Future research should address these concerns to improve reproductive counseling for individuals with NF1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.