ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2026
Dietary green tea residue improves growth and antioxidant capacity via rumen microbiota and glutathione modulation in finishing beef cattle.
Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGreen tea residue (GTR) is an abundant by-product rich in polyphenols. This study aimed to investigate the effects of GTR on growth performance, rumen microbiota, and systemic metabolism in finishing beef cattle.
resultsForty-five 18‑month‑old finishing Angus steers with an average initial body weight of 474.44 ± 14.03 kg (mean ± SD) were individually housed and randomly assigned to three dietary treatments (n = 15 per group) using stratified randomization by initial body weight: control group (CG group, 150 g rice straw), low-dose GTR group (LG group, 75 g rice straw +75 g GTR), and high-dose GTR group (HG group, 150 g GTR). The feeding trial lasted 70 d with a 10-day adaptation period. To elucidate the regulatory mechanisms of GTR on beef cattle growth, we thoroughly assessed growth performance, nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation parameters, conducted bacterial 16S rRNA sequencing, analysed plasma biochemical and antioxidant markers, and executed an untargeted plasma metabolomic analysis. The LG group tended to increase average daily gain (ADG). Meanwhile, the LG group exhibited elevated plasma concentrations of β-hydroxybutyrate and glucose, increased activities of superoxide dismutase and glutathione S-transferase, an increased glutathione (GSH)/glutathione disulfide (GSSG) ratio, and reduced GSSG content. GTR treatment decreased reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress index. Furthermore, dietary GTR significantly modified the rumen microbial community structure, enriching Xylanibacter and Prevotellaceae_UCG-003, while reducing the abundance of Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group. Plasma metabolomics revealed that GTR treatment enriched GSH Metabolism and the Pentose Phosphate Pathway. Notably, gamma-glutamylcysteine was identified as a key mediator of the association between Xylanibacter and ADG in fattening beef cattle supplemented with GTR.
conclusionsDietary supplementation with 75 g/steer/d GTR improved growth performance and systemic antioxidant capacity in finishing beef cattle by modulating the rumen microbiota and activating the glutathione system. GTR represents a promising functional feed additive that simultaneously valorizes tea by‑products and enhances livestock productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.