ArticleBMC medicine2026
Bladder cancer precision-cut tumor slices (PCTS) preserve functional immune microenvironment enabling ex vivo drug evaluation.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe development of effective cancer immunotherapies is hindered by the lack of preclinical models that faithfully preserve tumor-immune interactions. Current approaches provide limited representation of immune components, creating a critical translational gap between laboratory findings and clinical outcomes. Precision Cut Tumor Slices (PCTS) offer a promising solution by maintaining complete tumor architecture including native immune cell populations and spatial organization.
methodsWe established a PCTS platform using fresh bladder cancer specimens and optimized culture conditions to preserve tissue integrity and cell viability. Comprehensive phenotyping was performed using flow cytometry to characterize tumor and immune cell populations. Immune functionality was validated through CD3/CD28 stimulation experiments measuring activation markers (CD69, CD137, HLA-DR) and cytokine secretion. Nine patient samples were treated with the PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab to assess ex vivo effects. Additionally, multiplex immunofluorescence microscopy was employed on fixed PCTS as a readout for spatial distribution and cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy agents.
resultsPCTS maintained viability of both cancer cells and diverse immune populations for up to six days. Functional validation demonstrated immune responsiveness upon T cell stimulation, with elevated activation markers and significantly increased secretion of inflammatory mediators including IFNγ and CXCL10, in treated as compared to control samples. The platform successfully addressed intra-tumor heterogeneity while maintaining experimental reproducibility across patient samples. Treatment with nivolumab revealed heterogeneous responses, with two out of nine samples (22%) demonstrating dose-dependent immune activation in the PCTS model, consistent with published response rates. Multiplex immunofluorescence analysis confirmed the ability to capture both immune-mediated responses and direct cytotoxic effects on cancer cells, enabling comprehensive evaluation of combination therapies.
conclusionsThis validated PCTS platform represents a versatile human-derived tool for evaluating cancer immunotherapies while maintaining physiological tumor microenvironment complexity. The technical foundation established here enables future prospective studies correlating ex vivo responses with patient clinical outcomes, potentially advancing personalized treatment selection and reducing reliance on animal models in immunotherapy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.