ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Absolutist word usage in spoken language as a marker of depression: an ecological momentary assessment study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCognitive distortions are central to the maintenance of depression, as they bias information processing and negatively impact adaptive emotion regulation. As one manifestation of cognitive distortions, usage of absolutist words (e.g., always, never, must, completely) in written texts has been found to be indicative of underlying depression. Since absolutist word usage may allow important insights into maladaptive thinking patterns, it could be a relevant target for both monitoring and treating depressive symptoms. Therefore, we tested the relationships between absolutist word usage in spoken language with depression diagnosis, depressive symptom severity and current depressed mood.
methodWe recruited 144 age- and gender-matched participants with clinical depression (n = 48), subclinical depression (n = 48), and no history of depression (n = 48). By conducting smartphone-based ecological momentary assessments (EMA) three times daily for two weeks, participants provided ratings of depressed mood and speech samples, which included mood descriptions and mood-regulating statements. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) was administered at the end of the 2-week period to assess depressive symptom severity retrospectively. Group differences were calculated with ANOVAs, associations between depressed mood and absolutist word usage were evaluated with multilevel models, and the relationship between depressive symptom severity and absolutist word usage was calculated with regression models.
resultsResults showed more frequent absolutist word usage over the EMA phase in individuals with clinical depression compared to individuals with no history of depression. Furthermore, absolutist word usage was negatively associated with momentary depressed mood among individuals with elevated depressive symptoms. Additional analyses testing the temporal relationship showed that greater absolutist word usage was associated with higher levels of depressed mood after 12-24 h. Accordingly, absolutist word usage was positively associated with depressive symptom severity assessed after the 2-week period.
conclusionOur results have several implications: First, absolutist word usage in spoken language appears to be an indicator of depression, which may be relevant for the optimization of depression assessment and monitoring approaches. Second, the finding that absolutist word usage was associated with lower depressed mood in the short-term, but higher depressed mood in the long-term provides important insights into the mechanisms of depression, and may help identify relevant treatment targets for clinicians.
trial registrationGerman Clinical Trial Registration DRKS00023670 on 19/01/2021 ( https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00023670 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.