Observational studyBMC pulmonary medicine2026
Post-transplant trajectories of the CRP-to-albumin ratio identify a late-emerging high-risk phenotype in interstitial lung disease.
Observational study in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02951416 (The European IPF Registry - an Internet-based, Pan-European Registry Linked to the European IPF Biobank), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The European IPF Registry - an Internet-based, Pan-European Registry Linked to the European IPF Biobank (eurIPFbank)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAfter bilateral lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease (ILD), most recipients recover well, but some deteriorate over the following years. The C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) combines a marker of systemic inflammation (CRP) with one of nutritional and hepatic-synthetic reserve (albumin); a rising ratio reflects worsening inflammation against falling reserve. We assessed whether tracking CAR over time identifies the subgroup at risk.
methodsWe studied 138 consecutive adult ILD recipients of bilateral lung transplants (Giessen, 2000 to 2026), with a median of 13 paired CRP and albumin measurements each. Using group-based trajectory modelling, we grouped patients by the trajectory of their CAR from the first routine follow-up visit (month 4) to year 5, then related the groups to five-year survival and the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS).
resultsThree CAR trajectories emerged. Most patients were stable-low (39%, CAR near zero throughout) or resolving (38%, initially high then falling). The key group was CAR-rising (23%): at four months these patients were indistinguishable from the best-recovering stable-low group but then climbed steadily over the following years. Five-year survival was 92%, 61% and 69% in the stable-low, rising and resolving groups (log-rank p = 0.029; rising versus stable-low hazard ratio 4.5, 95% CI 1.2 to 17.1). A landmark analysis among patients alive at year 2 confirmed this late risk: 33% of the rising group died over the next three years versus 5% of the stable-low group (p = 0.005). In the pre-specified model, phenotype membership was not predicted by ILD subtype or LAS at listing (likelihood-ratio p = 0.16); pre-transplant CAR itself differed modestly across the groups (p = 0.049) but was not prognostic for survival. The CFS trajectory, scored independently of CRP and albumin, showed the same pattern: groups were equally frail before transplant (p = 0.83) but separated afterwards (p = 0.01 at 4 months, p = 0.001 at 5 years), the adverse groups drifting back toward frailty.
conclusionsA simple test already measured at every post-transplant visit, the CRP-to-albumin ratio, can be read as a trajectory to identify the ILD recipients who enter an inflammatory and nutritional decline associated with worse five-year survival. These findings are hypothesis-generating, and further work is needed to establish what drives the CAR trajectory before any clinical application.
trial registrationThe analysis draws on two registries: the European IPF Registry and Biobank (eurIPFreg; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02951416, registered 1 November 2016) and the European ILD Registry and Biobank (eurILDreg; German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00028968, registered 26 July 2022).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.