ArticleJournal of environmental quality
Soil polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in energy chemical industrial plants of Northwest China: Sources and health risk implications from a field-based study.
Article in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils of energy chemical industrial plants pose considerable ecological and health risks. However, comprehensive studies between petrochemical and coal chemical plants in arid Northwest China remain limited. In this study, 75 surface soil samples (0-20 cm) were collected from 15 large-scale plants (four petrochemical and 11 coal chemical plants) across the region. Sixteen priority PAHs (∑PAHs) were quantified, and source apportionment was conducted using diagnostic ratios and principal component analysis-multiple linear regression (PCA-MLR). In addition, health risks were evaluated using toxic equivalence factors and incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) models. Results showed a stark contrast in PAHs concentrations, with coal chemical plants averaging 4652.2 ng/g and reaching up to 188,506.0 ng/g at a coal tar processing site, compared to 225.6 ng/g in petrochemical plants. Four-ring PAHs were predominant, accounting for 64.5% and 52.1% of total PAHs in coal chemical and petrochemical soils, respectively, indicative of high-temperature combustion sources. PCA-MLR analysis identified coal combustion as the dominant source at coal chemical sites (96.5%), while petrochemical sites exhibited mixed sources, including oil leakage (49.6%) and vehicular emissions (25.6%). Health risk assessment revealed that ILCR values exceeded the US EPA threshold of 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.