Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42681536›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

AI/ML-Driven Gene Analysis: New Perspectives on Variant Calling in Normal Human Tissue Using scRNA-seq Data.

Satoshi Oota

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Satoshi Oota, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan. oota@riken.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2439-6148

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have rapidly transformed bioinformatics, offering new solutions for data-intensive challenges in genomics. In this chapter, we introduce a practical protocol that contrasts a conventional variant-calling approach with a modern AI/ML-based method using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. Focusing on somatic variant detection in a normal human tissue, we explore the characteristics of variant calls-including variant types, read depth, and variant allele frequency (VAF)-and address technical challenges such as alignment artifacts near splice junctions and noise in RNA-seq data. We demonstrate that AI-based methods, such as DeepVariant, provide enhanced accuracy and confidence in genotype prediction compared to rule-based tools such as RNA-Mutect2. By outlining comparative workflows and analysis outputs, this chapter highlights the growing potential of AI/ML in improving variant discovery and interpretation in transcriptomic data, particularly in contexts lacking matched-normal controls.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputational BiologyGenetic VariationMachine LearningRNA-SeqSingle-Cell AnalysisGene FrequencyGenomicsHumansSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisSoftwareArtificial intelligence (AI)DeepVariantGenotype predictionMachine learning (ML)RNA-Mutect2Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq)Somatic variantsVariant allele frequency (VAF)Variant calling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.