Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42681534›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Comprehensive Guide to Gene Expression Analysis from Bulk and Single-Nucleus Transcriptomes.

S Akila Parvathy Dharshini, Y-H Taguchi, M Michael Gromiha

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S Akila Parvathy DharshiniDepartment of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600 036, Tamil Nadu, India. akila20@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2034-5164
Y-H TaguchiDepartment of Physics, Chuo University, Kasuga, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 112-8551, Japan.
M Michael GromihaDepartment of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600 036, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA sequencing is a revolutionary technique for studying gene expression, providing a global transcriptome landscape that helps us understand disease-associated patterns. To gain insights into cellular heterogeneity, the advancement of single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) has emerged as a powerful tool for analyzing gene expression at the single-cell level. The data generated by these techniques are massive, and handling such large datasets requires knowledge of big data analysis and machine learning methods to effectively manage and interpret the data. In this chapter, we cover quality control, normalization, sparse data handling, and transcript quantification for both bulk and snRNA-seq, along with strategies to address challenges such as multi-mapped reads and batch effects. Additionally, we examine how artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques can improve data processing and disease-associated pattern recognition. By comparing different methodologies, we highlight the strengths and limitations of both approaches and provide guidance on selecting the most appropriate strategy based on specific research objectives.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusGene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeAnimalsComputational BiologyHumansMachine LearningRNA, Small NuclearSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisRNA, Small NuclearBatch effectsBulk RNA sequencingCellular heterogeneityData handlingSingle-nucleus RNA sequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.