Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42681495›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Instance Segmentation as a Foundation for Quantitative Image Analysis in Leptospira Research.

Yuji Oyamada, Ryo Ozuru

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuji OyamadaDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan. oyamada@tottori-u.ac.jp.
Ryo OzuruDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microscopic agglutination test (MAT) is the gold standard for leptospirosis serodiagnosis, but its reliance on subjective visual assessment leads to interobserver variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a powerful pathway to overcome this limitation, enabling objective and reproducible quantification. The core feature of this technique lies in its ability to pinpoint the precise location and morphology of individual bacteria through instance segmentation. By identifying each bacterium at the pixel level, researchers can not only calculate agglutination rates in MAT based on objective physical definitions but also unlock diverse applications such as morphological profiling and motility analysis when integrated with object tracking techniques. This allows for more granular assessments of drug effects and fundamental bacterial behavior. This chapter provides a comprehensive, end-to-end guide for implementing advanced AI-driven analysis of Leptospira images (including MAT samples), covering the entire workflow from foundational data preparation to the deployment of sophisticated deep learning models.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedLeptospiraLeptospirosisAgglutination TestsArtificial IntelligenceDeep LearningHumansComputer-aided diagnosisDeep learningLeptospirosisMicroscopic agglutination test (MAT)Quantitative image analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.