Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42681387›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing (niPGT).

Luis Navarro-Sánchez, Carmen Rubio Lluesa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luis Navarro-SánchezResearch and Development Department, Igenomix - part of Vitrolife Group, Ronda Narcís Monturiol, Paterna, Spain. luis.navarro@vitrolifegroup.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3962-8615
Carmen Rubio LluesaResearch and Development Department, Igenomix - part of Vitrolife Group, Ronda Narcís Monturiol, Paterna, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selection of a normal euploid embryo for transfer is a crucial step in assisted reproduction treatment. While trophectoderm (TE) biopsy has been widely employed, the consequences of removing cells on embryo viability remain unknown. In contrast, non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT) can determine an embryo's chromosomal content without the need to perform a biopsy. This strategy obtains valuable information by analyzing the genetic material released by the blastocyst into the culture medium, with high concordance with TE biopsies, inner cell mass biopsies, and the whole embryo. To achieve this, the culture medium sample must contain enough good-quality embryonic material, which can be influenced by sample collection timing. Further, minimizing the risk of contamination remains crucial, as contamination can result in misdiagnosis. For these reasons, performing niPGT in an IVF laboratory requires slight modifications to the standard embryo culture protocol. Here, we describe the protocol to maximise the probability of obtaining an informative and accurate niPGT result.

Indexed as

BlastocystGenetic TestingPreimplantation DiagnosisCulture MediaEmbryo Culture TechniquesEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansPregnancyCulture MediaBlastocystcfDNAContaminationCulture mediumFresh/frozenniPGTPreimplantationPrioritizationValidation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.