Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42681386›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Embryo Biopsy.

Maurizio Poli, Christian Ottolini, Antonio Capalbo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maurizio PoliJuno Genetics, Rome, Italy.
Christian OttoliniJuno Genetics, Rome, Italy.
Antonio CapalboJuno Genetics, Rome, Italy. antcapalbo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0109-323X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trophectoderm (TE) biopsy is the preferred method for obtaining embryo specimens for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). Containing approximately 5-10 cells, TE biopsies offer a stronger DNA amplification template, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and representing the whole embryo's chromosomal makeup better than single-cell biopsies. Performing TE biopsy demands advanced micromanipulation expertize. The procedure involves using laser technology alongside micromanipulation to separate the specimen from the blastocyst. Different methods can be employed based on the blastocyst's features and laboratory conditions. Biopsy tubing requires exceptional manual dexterity and coordination. Achieving an efficient PGT program relies on optimized blastocyst culture, biopsy, tubing techniques, and reliable cryopreservation processes.

Indexed as

BlastocystEmbryo, MammalianPreimplantation DiagnosisBiopsyCryopreservationEmbryo Culture TechniquesFemaleFertilization in VitroGenetic TestingHumansMicromanipulationBlastocyst biopsyIVFMicromanipulationPreimplantation genetic testingTrophectoderm biopsy

Identifiers

PMID42681386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.