ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
Beyond Zolbetuximab: Next-Generation Targeting Strategies for CLDN18.2.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeClaudin 18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) has emerged as a clinically actionable target in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy established the first validated CLDN18.2-directed strategy, but also highlighted clinically important limitations: incomplete primary sensitivity, spatial and temporal heterogeneity of antigen expression, gastrointestinal toxicity, uncertain biomarker persistence after treatment, and the absence of an evidence-based sequence after progression. These limitations have accelerated development of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies, T-cell engagers, and rational combinations with chemotherapy or immune checkpoint blockade.
methodsThis review summarizes current evidence through July 2026, examines plausible mechanisms of resistance and biomarker evolution, and proposes a cautious, modality-specific framework for future clinical development.
resultsUpdated clinical data support proof of concept across multiple modalities. IBI343, an exatecan-based ADC, has shown antitumor activity with predominantly hematologic toxicity; vedotin-based ADCs demonstrate a different linker-payload profile with additional concern for microtubule-related cumulative toxicity. Randomized phase II data with satricabtagene autoleucel have established progression-free survival benefit over treatment of physician's choice in previously treated disease, although lymphodepletion-related cytopenias and cytokine-release syndrome require specialized infrastructure. Early studies of givastomig and IBI389 further support immune-engaging approaches.
conclusionTissue immunohistochemistry remains the reference method for treatment selection; circulating tumor DNA cannot currently reproduce membranous protein intensity or spatial distribution, and liquid-biopsy approaches for CLDN18.2 reassessment remain investigational.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42681308What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.