Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42681300›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

A Computational Protocol for Whole Brain Histology Imaging.

Chao-Ying Huang, Li-An Chu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chao-Ying HuangDepartment of Institute of Information Systems and Applications, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City, Taiwan.
Li-An ChuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Hsinchu City, Taiwan. lachu@ntu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in tissue clearing and multiplex labeling have enabled the rapid acquisition of high-resolution, whole-brain 3D imagery [3]. However, the resulting datasets are often massive in size and structurally complex, creating significant bottlenecks in data storage, processing, and analysis. Here, we propose a robust, end-to-end pipeline designed to manage and analyze these large-scale volumes efficiently. This protocol utilizes a chunk-based data structure (OME-Zarr) to drastically lower hardware memory requirements [2], enabling the processing of terabyte-scale data on standard workstations. We design a workflow that integrates artifact correction, automated deep learning segmentation, and atlas registration. Furthermore, the pipeline facilitates dynamic, multiscale 3D visualization via a web-based interface (Neuroglancer) [7], allowing for the remote exploration of massive datasets without the need for complete data transfer.

Indexed as

BrainImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalAnimalsDeep LearningHumansSoftwareWorkflowBig dataBrain registrationDeep learningExpansion microscopyImage analysisLight sheetNeuroglancerOME-Zarr

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.