Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42681293›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

An R-Based Workflow for Analysis of Data Independent Acquisition (DIA) Neuroproteomics Data.

William P Klare, Nicholas J DeBono, Chi Nam Ignatius Pang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William P KlareAustralian Proteomics Analysis Facility (APAF), Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nicholas J DeBonoInstitute for Biomedicine and Glycomics, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.
Chi Nam Ignatius PangAustralian Proteomics Analysis Facility (APAF), Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. ignatius.pang@mq.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomic studies are highly informative for identifying biological signatures. The data generated from such experiments are highly complex and require substantial computational expertise to analyze appropriately. Rigorous analysis is further confounded by the presence of missing values and multiple sources of technical variance. Here, we present a methodical walkthrough of a workflow for the analysis of Data Independent Acquisition (DIA) proteomics data. The workflow is derived from the MultiScholaR framework, which aims to make best-in-class tools and practices available to researchers of all skill levels. Users will analyze a publicly available neuroproteomics dataset, searching data using DIA-NN, filtering and normalizing resultant data, before imputing missing values and removing technical variance using relevant tools in the field. Users will be able to generate easy to understand results on the individual protein and functional annotation level, with results and plots automatically formatted to be publication-ready. Designed for researchers of all skill levels, MultiScholaR emphasizes modularity, transparency, and learning through tunable parameters, extensive documentation, and automated reporting. Upon completion, users should feel equipped to analyze their own datasets confidently, bridging the gap between data generation and biological interpretation.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteomicsSoftwareAnimalsHumansWorkflowData independent acquisitionNeuroscienceProteomicsR

Identifiers

PMID42681293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.