Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42681265›Full record

Observational studySleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2026

Association between mandibular chewing patterns and sleep bruxism characteristics: a clinical observational study.

Saichao Zhou, Marina V Loktionova, Oleg S Glazachev

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saichao Zhou *Department of Orthodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8/2 Trubetskaya Str., Moscow, 119991, Russia. sczhouphd@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5319-0100
Marina V Loktionova *Department of Orthodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8/2 Trubetskaya Str., Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Oleg S Glazachev *Department of Normal Physiology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Head of the Scientific Direction, V.P. Filatov International Foundation for the development of biomedical technologies, 8/2 Trubetskaya Str., Moscow, 119991, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSleep bruxism (SB) is a sleep-related movement behavior characterized by rhythmic or non-rhythmic masticatory muscle activity that may contribute to tooth wear, jaw discomfort, and temporomandibular disorders. While SB is commonly assessed using polysomnography (PSG) and electromyography (EMG), daytime functional markers that predict SB intensity and phenotype remain insufficiently defined. Chewing patterns reflect neuromuscular coordination of mandibular movement and may share motor control pathways with SB-related masticatory activity.

objectiveTo investigate whether mandibular chewing patterns are associated with SB characteristics, including episode frequency, EMG intensity, and activity phenotype.

methodsIn this clinical observational study, 120 adults underwent standardized chewing assessments with three-dimensional jaw tracking during controlled chewing tasks. Chewing patterns were classified into: (i) bilateral alternating, (ii) unilateral preferred-side, and (iii) irregular/unstable pattern. Participants then completed one-night laboratory PSG with bilateral masseter EMG and audio-video monitoring. SB characteristics were quantified as Bruxism Episode Index (BEI, episodes/hour), phenotype distribution (phasic/tonic/mixed), burst count, episode duration, peak EMG amplitude (%MVC), and temporal coupling with cortical micro-arousals. Multivariable regression models tested associations between chewing pattern and SB metrics controlling for age, sex, BMI, caffeine intake, smoking, perceived stress, and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI).

resultsCompared with bilateral alternating chewers, unilateral preferred-side chewers had higher BEI (median [IQR], 3.2 [2.2-4.6] vs. 1.9 [1.2-2.8]) and higher peak EMG (%MVC) (38.4 ± 12.6 vs. 29.1 ± 10.8). Irregular chewers demonstrated the highest tonic proportion (27.8% vs. 14.3% in bilateral group) and longer episode duration (8.9 ± 2.7 s vs. 6.4 ± 2.1 s). In multivariable models, unilateral and irregular chewing patterns independently predicted BEI (β = +0.88 and + 1.21 episodes/h, respectively) and peak EMG (β = +6.1%MVC and + 8.4%MVC, respectively). The association persisted after adjusting for AHI and micro-arousal index.

conclusionsMandibular chewing patterns are associated with SB intensity and phenotype. Unilateral preferred-side and irregular chewing patterns may indicate altered sensorimotor control that corresponds to more intense and tonically weighted SB. Daytime chewing assessment may provide a practical functional marker for SB risk stratification and individualized management.

Indexed as

MandibleMasticationSleep BruxismAdultElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMasseter MuscleMiddle AgedPolysomnographyChewing patternClinical phenotypeJaw trackingMandibular movementMasseter electromyographyRhythmic masticatory muscle activitySleep bruxism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.