Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42681224›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Xenopus laevis Egg Extracts.

Paolo Passaretti, Agnieszka Gambus

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paolo PassarettiDepartment of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. p.passaretti@bham.ac.uk.
Agnieszka GambusDepartment of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. a.gambus@bham.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenopus laevis egg extracts represent one of the most versatile tools for biochemical analyses of complex cellular processes in a controlled in vitro environment. Developed from unfertilized oocytes, these extracts preserve the biochemical richness of the early embryonic cytoplasm, which is preloaded with maternal factors to drive rapid cell cycles without transcription. Historically, pioneering work by Lohka and Masui established the first cell-free system capable of nuclear assembly and chromosome condensation, while subsequent studies by Blow, Laskey, Newport, Kirschner, and others demonstrated faithful DNA replication. Over time, distinct extract types have emerged, including low-speed supernatant, high-speed supernatant, and nucleoplasmic extract, each tailored to specific mechanistic questions, from nuclear envelope formation to replisome dynamics. These systems have enabled to characterize fundamental principles of cell-cycle control, chromatin organization, and genome stability, and continue to underpin research in DNA replication, nuclear transport, spindle assembly, and checkpoint regulation.

Indexed as

Cell ExtractsOocytesOvumXenopus laevisAnimalsCell-Free SystemCell NucleusChromatinDNA ReplicationCell ExtractsChromatinCell-free systemDNA replicationHigh-Speed Supernatant (HSS)Low-Speed Supernatant (LSS)Nucleoplasmic Extract (NPE)Xenopus laevis

Identifiers

PMID42681224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.