ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2026
Clinical outcomes of near-infrared photoimmunotherapy according to immune checkpoint inhibitor timing and treatment sequence: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNear-infrared photoimmunotherapy (NIR-PIT) is a novel local treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer. However, the clinical significance of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) timing and treatment sequencing remains unclear. This study investigated their association with clinical outcomes after NIR-PIT.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study included 44 patients with 48 lesions who underwent initial NIR-PIT between January 2021 and March 2026. The primary analysis compared outcomes according to prior ICI exposure. An exploratory analysis evaluated outcomes according to treatment sequence and timing of ICI administration. The primary endpoint was local control. Secondary endpoints were objective response rate and disease control rate, while overall survival was assessed exploratorily.
resultsMedian local control duration was 253 days, but was 174 days in the prior ICI exposure group and 342 days in the non-prior ICI exposure group (log-rank P = 0.031). Local progression occurred in 69.2-37.1% of lesions, respectively (P = 0.059). Among 45 evaluable lesions, the objective response rate and disease control rate were 60.0-93.3%, respectively. Median overall survival was 866 days. Exploratory analyses suggested potential differences in clinical outcomes according to treatment sequence and ICI timing.
conclusionsPrior ICI exposure was associated with poorer local control after NIR-PIT. Exploratory analyses suggested that ICI timing and treatment sequencing may influence clinical outcomes. Treatment sequencing may represent an important consideration when integrating NIR-PIT and ICIs for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42681211What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.