Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42681190›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Using peCHYRON to Record Mammalian Cells' History of Chemical Exposure into Their DNA.

Matt C Demelo, Theresa B Loveless

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matt C DemeloDepartment of Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Theresa B LovelessDepartment of Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA. theresa.loveless@rice.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate development involves progressive differentiation guided by intrinsic and extrinsic cues; at the population level this yields reproducible outcomes even though single-cell lineage choices can vary between individuals. Variability between individual animals, along with opaque bodies and large numbers of cells, complicates the study of development in vertebrate models. DNA recording technology allows developmental biologists to follow each cell's history, without needing to average across multiple organisms, by stably recording lineage and historical cell signaling as small changes to each cell's genome, which can be read out by DNA sequencing at the end of the experiment [1,2]. Recently, we developed a continuous DNA recording platform, peCHYRON, which allows long-term, multiplexed recording of events in mammalian cells [3]. Here, we describe the design, implementation, and analysis of peCHYRON experiments, demonstrating an example experiment in which constitutive, doxycycline-inducible, and IPTG-inducible gene expression events are recorded concurrently into the DNA of populations of cells. This protocol covers the following steps: the molecular cloning of peCHYRON component plasmids, construction of peCHYRON cell lines, execution of peCHYRON experiments, long-read amplicon sequencing of DNA records, and analysis.

Indexed as

DNAAnimalsCell LineCloning, MolecularHumansPlasmidsDNAAmplicon sequencingCell fate historyDNA memoryDNA recordingGolden Gate toolkitLineage tracingMolecular recorderNanopore sequencingPiggyBac integrationPrime editing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.