Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42681107›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

The contribution of semantic control to elaborative episodic encoding.

Fiona Lancelotte, Alexa Morcom

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fiona LancelotteSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, BN1 9QH, UK. f.lancelotte@sussex.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7431-0431
Alexa MorcomSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, BN1 9QH, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T008768/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding events is fundamental to remembering them later, but it remains unclear how incoming information is linked to prior knowledge. We investigated whether episodic memory encoding depends on semantic control processes that allow people to use their knowledge in a flexible and task-relevant manner. We manipulated semantic control type and demand at encoding to compare the contributions of two key processes: controlled semantic retrieval and semantic selection. In two preregistered experiments, young adults studied object images in two semantic encoding tasks. They matched the object either to the word most related in meaning out of three (controlled retrieval) or the word most similar in size (semantic selection). We then tested participants' memory to see whether these semantic control processes affected concept-level item recognition, specific old-lure discrimination (Experiment 1, N = 78), and source memory (Experiment 2, N = 64). The results revealed that controlled semantic retrieval at encoding improved concept-level recognition compared with semantic selection but did not impact specific memory. Although encoding judgements were slower under greater control demand (image-word semantic similarity indexed by word2vec), demand did not significantly impact later memory on any measure. We then used a hierarchical Bayesian multinomial processing tree model to estimate source memory parameters. This revealed better source memory detection following encoding with controlled retrieval compared to semantic selection. Together, the results show that memory representations are shaped by the semantic control processes engaged at encoding and suggest that controlled semantic retrieval may be a key contributor to elaborative semantic encoding.

Indexed as

Elaborative encodingEpisodic memorySemantic control

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.