Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42681099›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

In Vitro Preclinical Evaluation of BPP-PNA Antisense Antibiotics: A Protocol for Efficacy, Safety, and Resistance Analysis.

Alireza Japoni-Nejad, Lise Goltermann, Peter E Nielsen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alireza Japoni-NejadFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. alireza@sund.ku.dk.
Lise GoltermannFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter E NielsenFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global challenge of antibacterial resistance necessitates urgent efforts to develop novel antimicrobial agents with innovative chemical scaffolds. Bacterial-penetrating peptide-peptide nucleic acid (BPP-PNA) conjugates represent a promising class of antisense antibiotics (ASObiotics) capable of selectively targeting bacterial gene expression. This chapter provides a structured protocol for the preclinical evaluation of new BPP-PNA compounds, focusing on efficacy, resistance potential, safety, and mechanism of action. Efficacy assessment includes determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), followed by time-kill assays to evaluate bactericidal kinetics. The combination efficacy of multiple BPP-PNAs is investigated using checkerboard assays. Safety and biocompatibility studies include hemolysis assays on red blood cells and cytotoxicity assessments using cell lines relevant to the infection site and drug metabolism and clearance. To evaluate the propensity for resistance development (spontaneous mutation frequency), bacterial populations (10

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialOligonucleotides, AntisensePeptide Nucleic AcidsAnimalsBacteriaDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHemolysisHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsOligonucleotides, AntisensePeptide Nucleic AcidsAntisense antibioticsBacterial-penetrating peptide (BPP)Frequency of resistance (FoR)Mechanism of actionPeptide nucleic acid (PNA)Preclinical evaluation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.