Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42681037›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

An Efficient Colony PCR Method for Construct Verification in the Basidiomycete Ustilago maydis.

Pascal Künzel, Andreas Müsgens, Lars M Blank, Nick Wierckx

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pascal KünzelInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences Biotechnology (IBG-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Andreas MüsgensInstitute of Applied Microbiology-iAMB, Aachen Biology and Biotechnology-ABBt, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Lars M BlankInstitute of Applied Microbiology-iAMB, Aachen Biology and Biotechnology-ABBt, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Nick WierckxInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences Biotechnology (IBG-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany. n.wierckx@fz-juelich.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid advances in AI-driven annotation and automation are increasing the demand for fast and reliable screening protocols for reverse genetic approaches. Traditional methods for genomic DNA extraction from the basidiomycete Ustilago maydis are often time-consuming and require expensive reagents and hazardous chemicals, making them unsuitable for large-scale mutant screening. Existing colony PCR protocols using crude lysates without DNA precipitation are fast but often fail in terms of reproducibility because cellular components can interfere with polymerase activity or DNA stability. These limitations can be addressed by adapting the yeast GC-prep protocol of Blount et al., based on glass-bead lysis and boiling in the presence of the metal-chelating resin Chelex-100, and combining it with the impurity-tolerant Phire Hot Start II DNA Polymerase. Here, we present a straightforward and reliable protocol for DNA isolation and storage in the screening of U. maydis mutants, enabling the reproducible amplification of 0.5-5 kb fragments directly from fresh colonies grown on agar plates.

Indexed as

DNA, FungalPolymerase Chain ReactionUstilagoBasidiomycotaMutationDNA, FungalChelex-100Colony PCRDNA isolationFungal geneticsGlass beadsMutant screeningPCRUstilago maydisYeast

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.