Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42681023›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Computational and Statistical Framework for Quantitative Proteomics Analysis.

Ismail Kirrout, Nuria Montes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ismail KirroutServicio de Inmunología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario la Princesa (IIS Princesa), Madrid, Spain. ismail.kirrout@upm.es.
Nuria MontesUnidad de Metodología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa, Madrid, Spain. nmontes@salud.madrid.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics usually produces large datasets that require exhaustive analysis to extract underlying biological information. This chapter presents a step-by-step pipeline for the statistical and computational analysis of such data, oriented and generalizable to any mass spectrometry-derived proteomic dataset. These steps include: (i) data preprocessing and quality control, (ii) identification of differentially abundant proteins through statistical modeling, (iii) functional enrichment analyses, including Over Representation Analysis (ORA) and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to integrate proteomic changes in the context of biological processes and pathways, and, finally, (iv) interactome (protein-protein interaction) construction and visualization to situate proteomic alterations within signaling networks. Throughout, reproducible off-the-shelf R code and practical guidance for each step are provided, facilitating an end-to-end analysis from raw proteomic data to the biological interpretation, illustrated with visualization examples and best-practice recommendations. The complete script and necessary files are freely available at https://github.com/UMBB-IIS-Princesa/Quantitative-Proteomics-Pipeline.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteomeProteomicsHumansMass SpectrometryProtein Interaction MapsSoftwareProteomeComputationalProteomicsProteomics-analysis

Identifiers

PMID42681023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.