ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026
A Dynamic Boolean Model of the Mammalian Cell Cycle: Enhanced Robustness and Mutational Analysis.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mammalian cell cycle is a tightly regulated process driven by cyclins, their regulators. While previous Boolean models captured certain aspects of cell cycle dynamics, they suffered from incomplete coverage of key regulatory proteins and limited temporal realism. Here, we present an improved Boolean model of the mammalian cell cycle core control system. The model incorporates a complete set of 13 essential elements, including cyclins (D, E, A, B), their transcription factors (Myc, TFE, TFB), inhibitors (p27, Rb), ubiquitin-mediated degraders (SCF, CDH1, CDC20A, CDC20B). We also introduce synchronous, asynchronous updating schemes with realistic time delays for protein activation, enabling a more accurate temporal representation of cell cycle progression. Simulation results reveal two principal attractors: a stable G0 attractor, a 20-state limit cycle attractor representing realistic phase transitions of the cell cycle. Robustness, sensitivity analyses demonstrate that the system is highly resilient, while mutation studies highlight vulnerabilities-particularly that overexpression of certain regulators halts cell cycle progression more frequently than knockouts. This chapter provides detailed modeling steps, Boolean logic formulations, simulation procedures, and mutation experiments. Possible extensions of the model are also provided, along with some guidance on implementing and troubleshooting Boolean models for cell cycle analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42680997What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.