ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2026
Symptomatic treatment for Alzheimer disease: current evidence and future directions.
Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Symptomatic treatment remains central to the clinical management of Alzheimer disease (AD), even as disease-targeted therapies emerge. This Review synthesizes current evidence for pharmacological and non-pharmacological symptomatic therapies targeting cognition, function and neuropsychiatric symptoms in AD. Non-pharmacological interventions, including cognitive training, physical exercise, cognitive stimulation therapy and multimodal lifestyle programmes, show small-to-moderate benefits, particularly in mild cognitive impairment, although implementation challenges persist. Established pharmacological treatments, notably cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine, deliver modest but significant benefits, with biomarker-stratified analyses suggesting the greatest benefit in individuals with confirmed AD pathology. Advances in muscarinic agonists, multitarget agents, neurotrophic modulators and repurposed drugs highlight emerging opportunities for broader symptomatic benefit. Neuropsychiatric symptoms remain highly prevalent and burdensome; personalized psychosocial interventions demonstrate meaningful reductions in agitation and depression, whereas atypical antipsychotics offer only modest efficacy with substantial safety concerns. Newer agents, including brexpiprazole for agitation and pimavanserin for psychosis, show promise but require careful interpretation of effect size and safety. Future progress will depend on biomarker-informed patient selection, integration of circuit-level measures, rational combination strategies spanning pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities, and adoption of patient-centred outcomes. Symptomatic therapies will remain essential for improving quality of life in people with AD, even as disease-targeted therapies reshape disease trajectories.
Identifiers
42680930What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.