ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Machine learning models for early detection of urinary tract infections in kidney transplant patients.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High discrimination does not ensure clinical transportability: methodological considerations in machine learning prediction of urinary tract infection after kidney transplantation.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRenal transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage chronic kidney disease but requires lifelong immunosuppression, increasing the risk of infections such as urinary tract infection (UTI). UTI in kidney transplant recipients can lead to serious complications, including acute kidney injury, reduced graft survival, and increased mortality. Machine learning can enhance risk detection accuracy and support proactive management of complications. This study aims to develop a machine learning-based approach for predicting urinary tract infections in kidney transplant recipients, facilitating the early identification of high-risk individuals.
methodsRetrospective cohort of 29,340 anonymized records from a Colombian transplant center to develop and compare machine learning models for predicting UTI in post-kidney transplant patients. Fifteen machine learning models were evaluated using 41 sociodemographic and clinical variables. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as accuracy and area under the ROC curve (AUC).
resultsBoth models are good, with Random Forest achieving 93.57% accuracy, 94.43% AUC, 92.5% sensitivity, and 95.2% specificity. XGBoost achieved 91.14% accuracy, 91.65% AUC, 90.8% sensitivity, and 92.6% specificity. Feature importance analysis revealed that key predictors included Body mass index (BMI), use of mofetil mycophenolate or sodium mycophenolate, donor type, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, use of steroids, re-transplantation, serum levels of tacrolimus and sex of the recipient.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the potential of machine learning models to predict UTI in kidney transplant patients, offering a tool for early intervention and personalized care. Implementing these models in clinical settings could improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs by preventing severe complications associated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42680911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.