ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Defining fever-related discomfort in children: an international Delphi consensus.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fever is one of the most common symptoms in childhood and a frequent reason for medical consultation. Current guidelines recommend treating fever only when discomfort is present. However, the concept of fever-related discomfort remains poorly defined and inconsistently applied in clinical practice and research studies. We aimed to develop an expert-based definition and a pragmatic clinical framework for the assessment and management of discomfort in febrile children. An international modified Delphi consensus was conducted to develop an operational definition and pragmatic clinical framework for fever-related discomfort in children. A steering international committee developed initial statements, which were evaluated across three iterative online Delphi rounds by seven international experts from high-income countries. Agreement was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, with consensus predefined as ≥ 75% agreement. Experts' feedback was used to refine statements between rounds. The panel reached consensus that fever-related discomfort is a multidimensional construct encompassing behavioral, emotional, and functional indicators. A traffic-light system was developed to stratify discomfort severity into: green (no intervention needed); amber (case-by-case intervention); and red (intervention always indicated) categories. Key clinical indicators were identified for each category. The framework was considered applicable across pediatric age groups and care settings, with individualized clinical judgment recommended for children with chronic conditions or those in intensive care.
conclusionThis international Delphi consensus provides a preliminary expert-derived framework for defining and assessing fever-related discomfort in children. Future studies are warranted to evaluate its reliability, feasibility, cultural applicability, and clinical validity across larger and more diverse populations and healthcare settings. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Current pediatric guidelines recommend treating fever in children only when discomfort is present rather than aiming to normalize body temperature. • However, fever-related discomfort remains poorly defined, with substantial heterogeneity across studies and guidelines and no standardized clinical framework currently available. WHAT IS NEW: • This international Delphi consensus defines fever-related discomfort as a multidimensional construct involving behavioral, emotional, and functional indicators. • A pragmatic Traffic-Light System was developed to stratify discomfort severity and support clinical decision-making across pediatric settings and age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.