ReviewBritish journal of cancer2026
Why early pathology input matters in biologically rich cancer trials.
Review in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Polygenic scores in the NHS: the debate is not primarily about the evidence.Nature medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pathology is central to many biologically driven cancer clinical trials. Biomarker-led and translational studies depend on robust tissue pathways, cellular and molecular assays, pathology-derived endpoints, and clinically meaningful interpretation of discovery science. Where trials depend on tumour material, biomarker-defined eligibility or mechanism-focused endpoints, pathology expertise should be embedded early, before protocols, budgets, and assays are fixed. Early pathology input strengthens feasibility, specimen governance, assay selection, quality assurance, and the long-term value of collected samples. In the UK, the Clinical Trials Pathology Advisory Group, now within the new Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland Clinical Trials Pathology subcommittee, provides a practical route for pre-submission specialist review. This Perspective argues that pathology is core infrastructure for biologically rich trials, linking discovery science to clinical translation.
Identifiers
42680889What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.