Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42680870›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026

Global trends and knowledge mapping of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome research: a bibliometric analysis.

Lin Hu, Mingyi Zhao, Qingnan He

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lin HuDepartment of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Mingyi ZhaoDepartment of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China. zhao_mingyi@csu.edu.cn.
Qingnan HeDepartment of Pediatrics, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China. heqn2629@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82570835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is a major cause of kidney failure and remains a clinical challenge. Bibliometric analysis offers a quantitative approach to reveal research patterns and hotspots, yet, to our knowledge, no bibliometric analysis has focused specifically on SRNS. To summarize global research trends and future directions in SRNS. Publications related to SRNS from 1 January 1999 to 14 June 2026 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. Bibliometric analyses were performed using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and RStudio. A total of 1,720 eligible articles and reviews from 91 countries were included. Annual publication output increased overall, although the 2026 data represented an incomplete year. The United States ranked first in both publications and citations; the University of Michigan, Friedhelm Hildebrandt, and Pediatric Nephrology were the most productive institution, author, and journal, respectively. Keyword analysis showed a transition from podocyte proteins and gene mutations toward multicenter cohorts, genetic testing, kidney transplantation, variants, and chronic kidney disease. The three most frequently co-cited references were Sadowski et al. (2015), Boute et al. (2000), and Ruf et al. (2004). This study maps the global SRNS literature and identifies major research trends and emerging themes, providing a reference for investigations into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of SRNS.

Indexed as

Bibliometric analysisChildrenCiteSpaceNephrotic syndromeSteroid-resistant nephrotic syndromeVOSviewer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.