ArticleScientific reports2026
Classification of bacterial biological warfare agent simulants through 2D Py-GC/MS data coupled with deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of Bacteria and Viruses by Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identification and detection of biological warfare agents (BWAs) constitute a critical task for both biodefence applications and public health protection. Gas Chromatography coupled with Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) represents a robust analytical platform due to its sensitivity to Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAMEs). However, the high chemical complexity of microorganisms necessitates more comprehensive molecular profiling. In this context, Pyrolysis-GC/MS (Py-GC/MS) is employed to thermally decompose intact bacterial cells, generating high-dimensional chromatographic signatures comprising a broad spectrum of volatile degradation products. In this study, eight bacterial species, including BWA simulants, Bacillus atrophaeus, Francisella philomiragia, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus mitis, Yersinia enterocolitica subsp. enterocolitica, Acinetobacter baumannii, Agromyces mediolanus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis, were analyzed at three concentration levels using a Py-GC/MS device. Four complementary data representations were derived from each measurement: 2D GC×MS chromatograms, 1D Total Ion Count (TIC) signals, FAME feature profiles, and Principal Component (PC) projections. The resulting dataset is publicly released to support reproducibility and further research. Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) models are subsequently employed to extract discriminative features and perform classification. For Gram type classification, each data representation-model pair is trained and validated on four bacterial classes and evaluated on four unseen classes, enabling a direct assessment of out-of-distribution generalization. For species-level identification, models are trained and evaluated on a subset of four bacterial classes, including two BWA simulants. The experimental results demonstrate that 2D chromatographic representations, when coupled with advanced DL architectures, consistently achieve superior performance in terms of accuracy and F1-score. Furthermore, the Limit of Detection (LOD) is systematically evaluated across all experimental settings, providing additional insight into the sensitivity and robustness of each data representation-model pair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.