Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42680800›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Classification of bacterial biological warfare agent simulants through 2D Py-GC/MS data coupled with deep learning.

Georgios Kirtsanis, Alejandra Vargas-Valderrama, Joeri Vercammen, Georgios Dolias, Spyridon Kintzios, Konstantinos Ioannidis, Stefanos Vrochidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Georgios KirtsanisInformation Technologies Institute (ITI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), 57001, Thessaloniki, Greece. gkirtsanis@iti.gr.ORCID 0009-0000-7115-3141
Alejandra Vargas-Valderrama *Belgian Defence Laboratories (DLD), 1800, Vilvoorde, Belgium.
Joeri Vercammen *Interscience Expert Center (IS-X), 1384, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Georgios Dolias *Information Technologies Institute (ITI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), 57001, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Spyridon KintziosInformation Technologies Institute (ITI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), 57001, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Konstantinos IoannidisInformation Technologies Institute (ITI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), 57001, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Stefanos VrochidisInformation Technologies Institute (ITI), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), 57001, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

European Union 101103176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification and detection of biological warfare agents (BWAs) constitute a critical task for both biodefence applications and public health protection. Gas Chromatography coupled with Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) represents a robust analytical platform due to its sensitivity to Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAMEs). However, the high chemical complexity of microorganisms necessitates more comprehensive molecular profiling. In this context, Pyrolysis-GC/MS (Py-GC/MS) is employed to thermally decompose intact bacterial cells, generating high-dimensional chromatographic signatures comprising a broad spectrum of volatile degradation products. In this study, eight bacterial species, including BWA simulants, Bacillus atrophaeus, Francisella philomiragia, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus mitis, Yersinia enterocolitica subsp. enterocolitica, Acinetobacter baumannii, Agromyces mediolanus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis, were analyzed at three concentration levels using a Py-GC/MS device. Four complementary data representations were derived from each measurement: 2D GC×MS chromatograms, 1D Total Ion Count (TIC) signals, FAME feature profiles, and Principal Component (PC) projections. The resulting dataset is publicly released to support reproducibility and further research. Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) models are subsequently employed to extract discriminative features and perform classification. For Gram type classification, each data representation-model pair is trained and validated on four bacterial classes and evaluated on four unseen classes, enabling a direct assessment of out-of-distribution generalization. For species-level identification, models are trained and evaluated on a subset of four bacterial classes, including two BWA simulants. The experimental results demonstrate that 2D chromatographic representations, when coupled with advanced DL architectures, consistently achieve superior performance in terms of accuracy and F1-score. Furthermore, the Limit of Detection (LOD) is systematically evaluated across all experimental settings, providing additional insight into the sensitivity and robustness of each data representation-model pair.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiological Warfare AgentsDeep LearningGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryClassification AlgorithmsPyrolysisVolatile Organic CompoundsBiological Warfare AgentsVolatile Organic CompoundsBacteriaBiological warfare agents (BWAs)Deep learning (DL)Machine learning (ML)Pyrolysis – Gas Chromatography – Mass Spectrometry (Py-GC/MS)Simulants

Identifiers

PMID42680800
PMCPMC13534614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.