Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42680787›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Uterine artery bulldog clamping versus tourniquet for reducing blood loss in open myomectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Uğur Kara, Onur Karaaslan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07553091 (Effects of Different Intraoperative Bleeding Control Methods on Haematological Outcomes and the Amount of Bleeding in Open Myomectomy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07553091 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Different Intraoperative Bleeding Control Methods on Haematological Outcomes and the Amount of Bleeding in Open Myomectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorYuzuncu Yil UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsUterine LeiomyomasArmsTourniquet application, Uterine artery bulldog clamp
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Uğur KaraFaculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, 65030, Tusba, Van, Turkey.
Onur KaraaslanFaculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, 65030, Tusba, Van, Turkey. onurkaraaslan@yyu.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excessive intraoperative bleeding remains a major challenge during open myomectomy and may lead to postoperative anemia and increased morbidity. Numerous methods have been suggested to minimize hemorrhage; however, evidence regarding their effectiveness in open surgery is limited. This study sought to evaluate the impact of tourniquet application, uterine artery bulldog clamping, and no-compression techniques on intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hematological outcomes in patients undergoing open myomectomy. This prospective randomized controlled trial comprised 120 patients undergoing open myomectomy, who were randomly assigned to three groups: tourniquet group (n = 40), uterine artery bulldog clamp group (n = 40), and no-compression group (n = 40). The primary outcome was intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes were hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct) levels at 24 and 48 h post-operatively. Myoma volume was calculated using the spherical formula based on the maximum myoma diameter. Statistical analyses were conducted using one-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD post hoc test for normally distributed variables, or the Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney U post hoc comparisons for non-normally distributed variables, as determined by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Multicollinearity was assessed using the variance inflation factor (VIF) prior to multivariate linear regression analysis. Baseline demographic and surgical characteristics, including number of myomas, largest myoma diameter, myoma volume, and FIGO classification, were comparable among the three groups (p > 0.05). Intraoperative blood loss differed significantly among the groups (p = 0.002) and was significantly higher in the no-compression group compared to both the tourniquet and bulldog clamp groups. No notable disparity in blood loss was detected between the tourniquet and bulldog clamp cohorts. Postoperative Hb and Hct levels at 24 and 48 h were higher in the bulldog clamp group compared to the tourniquet and no-compression groups (p < 0.001 for both). Operative time and postoperative platelet levels did not differ significantly among the groups. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the surgical technique applied and operative time were independently associated with intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.011 and p = 0.008, respectively). Temporary uterine artery occlusion using a bulldog clamp during open myomectomy was associated with significantly better preservation of postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels compared with tourniquet application and no-compression, without increasing operative time. Although intraoperative estimated blood loss did not differ significantly between the bulldog clamp and tourniquet groups, the superior hematological outcomes suggest that the bulldog clamp technique may represent an effective alternative strategy for preserving postoperative hematological parameters during open myomectomy.Clinical trial registration: The trial was registered retrospectively at ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration number NCT07553091 Registration date 22 April 2026). Reasons for retrospective registration and details of the predefined protocol are explained in the Methods and Limitations sections.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalTourniquetsUterine ArteryUterine MyomectomyAdultConstrictionFemaleHematocritHemoglobinsHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUterine NeoplasmsHemoglobinsBulldog clampHemostasisIntraoperative hemorrhageMyomectomyTourniquetUterine artery

Identifiers

PMID42680787
PMCPMC13534595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.