Trial reportNature communications2026
A second yearly booster dose of the VLA15 Lyme borreliosis vaccine candidate in healthy individuals.
Trial report in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04801420 (SAFETY AND IMMUNOGENICITY STUDY OF VLA15, A MULTIVALENT RECOMBINANT OSPA BASED VACCINE CANDIDATE AGAINST LYME BORRELIOSIS), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety and immunogenicity study of vla15, a multivalent recombinant ospa based vaccine candidate against lyme borreliosis: a randomized, controlled, observer-blind phase 2 study in a healthy pediatric and adult study population
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human vaccines against Lyme borreliosis, the most common tick-borne illness in Northern Hemispheric temperate climates, remain unavailable. Previous evaluations demonstrated the safety and immunogenicity of primary and booster dosing with VLA15, an investigational vaccine containing six Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato outer surface protein A serotypes. In this randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, participants 5 - 65 years of age were randomized 1:1:1 to receive VLA15 at Months (M) 0, 2, and 6; VLA15 at M0 and M6 and placebo at M2; or placebo at each time point. VLA15 and placebo recipients received VLA15 boosters and placebo, respectively, at M18 and M30. Here we report safety and immunogenicity from M19 through M31; earlier data were reported previously. In both VLA15 groups, serotype-specific immunoglobulin G geometric mean titers declined after the M18 booster but remained higher than after primary vaccination. The M30 VLA15 boosters induced robust, anamnestic immune responses across serotypes and age groups that were qualitatively similar to those after the M18 boosters. The M18 and M30 boosters had similar, acceptable tolerability profiles; no safety concerns arose through M31. These results further support the paradigm of VLA15 primary vaccination followed by yearly boosting to optimize potential protection against Lyme borreliosis. ( ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04801420 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.