ArticleNature communications2026
Activity-cliff awareness enables robust graph learning for molecular property prediction.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- How effective are contrastive learning-based approaches for activity-cliff prediction?bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Building structure activity relationships to avoid toxicity due to unwanted central nervous system ion channel activity.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Predictions of Henry Coefficients for Long-Chain Alkanes in One-Dimensional Zeolites: Application to Hydroisomerization.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately predicting molecular activity is hindered by activity cliffs (ACs), which are sharp potency changes between highly similar compounds that distort the smoothness assumed by modern quantitative structure-activity relationship (SAR) models and graph neural networks (GNNs). Here we introduce AC awareness (ACA), an inductive bias that reshapes GNN latent spaces to account for these discontinuities. Implemented through an ACA loss combining regression with soft-margin triplet contrastive learning, the method dynamically mines high-value activity-cliff triplets during training and corrects inconsistent neighborhoods in latent space. This process yields progressively fewer cliff violations, more coherent activity gradients, and reduced label incoherence across diverse chemical spaces. Evaluated on 52 datasets spanning low-sample narrow-scaffold series, large mixed-scaffold benchmarks, matched-pair cliff classification, and absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) property prediction, ACA consistently improves predictive accuracy over strong extended-connectivity fingerprint (ECFP) and GNN baselines. The approach generalizes across multiple GNN backbones and remains robust under fixed hyperparameters. These results suggest that ACA provides a principled strategy for enhancing molecular property prediction by aligning latent representations with the nonadditive behavior underlying ACs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.