ArticleNature communications2026
Positional grammar of transcription factor binding partitions developmental and stress-response regulation in plants.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how transcription factor binding site (TFBS) position influences gene regulation remains a fundamental challenge in plants. Here, we integrate conserved multiDAP TFBS maps for 244 transcription factors (TFs) with single-nucleus chromatin accessibility, cell type-resolved gene expression, and hormone-response datasets across Brassicaceae species to determine how TFBS position relates to regulatory function. Although conserved TFBSs are enriched near transcription start sites (TSSs), TSS-proximal accessibility poorly predicts cell type-specific expression. Instead, cell type-specific expression correlates best with conserved TFBSs embedded in cell type-restricted chromatin, with TF family-specific distributions across distal promoters and introns. In contrast, TSS-proximal TFBSs in broadly accessible chromatin are associated with rapid transcriptional responses to abiotic and biotic stress hormones. Coding sequence TFBSs mark a distinct regulatory context in which the same DNA sequence encodes both amino acid sequence and TF motifs, including evidence that CDS-localized ABR1 binding may contribute to repression during hormone response. Finally, distal upstream regions contain conserved multi-family TF clusters with enhancer-like features overlapping rare cell type-specific accessible chromatin and enriched near genes controlling embryonic, meristematic, and hormone-dependent developmental patterning. Together, these results support a positional grammar in which TFBS position and chromatin context jointly partition developmental, stress-responsive, and repressive regulatory output in plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.