ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2026
Improving RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Through Expanded Training Data.
Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structural probing of RNA hairpins quantifies protein occupancy on RNA and links it to function in human cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, deep-learning has revolutionized protein structure prediction, achieving remarkable speed and accuracy. RNA structure prediction, however, has lagged behind. Although several methods have shown moderate success in predicting RNA secondary and tertiary structures, none have reached the accuracy observed with contemporary protein models. The lack of success of these RNA structure prediction models has been proposed to be due to limited high-quality structural information that can be used as training data. To probe this proposed limitation, we developed a large and diverse dataset comprising paired RNA sequences and their corresponding secondary structures. We assessed the utility of this enhanced dataset by retraining on a deep-learning model, SincFold. We find that SincFold exhibited improved performance on a set of previously unseen RNA families, enhancing its capability to predict accurate de novo RNA secondary structures. We additionally implemented Lyra-TransPred, which achieved the highest mean F1 and MCC among the evaluated models while requiring substantially less training time per epoch. The RNASSTR dataset provides a substantial advance for RNA structure modeling, laying a strong foundation for the development of future RNA secondary structure prediction algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42680564What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.