ArticleGenome research2026
Resolving missing human polymorphic inversions and other complex variants from ultralong read data.
Article in Genome research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accurate imputation of inversions in human genomes using different algorithms and data sources.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inversions are a unique type of balanced structural variants (SVs) with important consequences in multiple organisms. However, despite considerable effort, these and other complex SVs remain poorly characterized because of the presence of large repeats. New techniques are finally allowing us to identify the full spectrum of human inversions, but the number of individuals analyzed is still quite limited. Here, we take advantage of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long reads to characterize an exhaustive catalog of 612 candidate inversions between 197 bp and 4.4 Mb of length, and flanked by <190 kb long inverted repeats (IRs). To that end, we have developed a bioinformatic package to identify inversion alleles reliably from long-read data. Next, using a combination of different DNA extraction, library preparation, and ONT sequencing protocols, we show that ultralong reads (50-100 kb) and adaptive sampling are an efficient method to detect most human inversions. Lastly, by analyzing ONT data from 54 diverse individuals, 87%-99% of the inversions can be genotyped in each sample, depending mainly on read and IR length and genome coverage. Both orientations have been observed for 155 of the analyzed regions (frequency 0.01-0.49), which triples the number of polymorphic IR-mediated inversions studied in detail so far. Moreover, we have found more than 300 additional independent SVs in the studied regions and resolved several complex rearrangements. Therefore, our work provides an accurate benchmark of those inversions that typically escape most analyses, and it demonstrates the potential of nanopore sequencing to characterize missing human genomic variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.