Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42680513›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2026

Machine learning workflows detect ground-dwelling arthropods against heterogenous backgrounds.

Robert J Boyd, Kayla I Perry, Thomas P Franzem, Christie Bahlai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert J BoydDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA.
Kayla I PerryDepartment of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9903-8057
Thomas P FranzemDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-5234-0363
Christie BahlaiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8937-8709

Funding

Greenacres Foundation Ecology & EnvironmentUS National Science Foundation DBI 2045721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Camera-based monitoring of arthropods is an emerging tool for studying activity, abundance, and behavior. However, many current approaches rely on custom-built camera systems and complex analytical workflows, which limit accessibility and broader adoption. In addition, most arthropod camera-monitoring systems image subjects against uniform backgrounds, conditions that may alter natural activity patterns and reduce ecological realism. Here, we present a camera-monitoring workflow designed to increase accessibility by using commercially available game cameras coupled with a streamlined image-processing pipeline. We evaluated the performance of this approach by imaging arthropods against a complex, heterogeneous background to assess its effectiveness under conditions more representative of field environments. Our object-detection model performed reliably across evaluation metrics and accurately identified arthropods captured in the images despite background complexity. These results demonstrate that low-cost, widely available camera systems can be integrated with simplified analytical workflows to enable effective arthropod monitoring without specialized hardware. This approach provides a scalable and accessible method for studying arthropods in more natural contexts and may facilitate broader adoption of camera-based monitoring in ecological research and biodiversity assessments.

Indexed as

ArthropodsEntomologyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningPhotographyAnimalsDetection AlgorithmsWorkflowcamera monitoringground-dwelling arthropodsobject detection

Identifiers

PMID42680513
PMCPMC13533566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.