ArticleJournal of Korean biological nursing science2026
Development of a predictive model for high-flow nasal cannula treatment failure in emergency department patients with acute heart failure: a retrospective secondary data analysis.
Article in Journal of Korean biological nursing science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study developed and internally validated a model integrating oxygenation, acid-base, and severity variables for high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) failure in emergency department (ED) patients with acute heart failure (AHF).
methodsThis retrospective secondary analysis included adults with AHF who received HFNC therapy in a tertiary ED between January 2021 and August 2025. Five prespecified predictors-follow-up saturation-to-fraction of inspired oxygen (S/F) ratio, follow-up respiratory rate-oxygenation index incorporating heart rate, norepinephrine use, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, and arterial pH-were entered into logistic regression and four machine learning algorithms using R 4.3.5 program.
resultsAmong 201 patients, 33 (16.4%) experienced HFNC failure. In the held-out test set, the five-variable logistic regression model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of .70 (95% confidence interval [CI], .51-.88), with a bootstrap optimism-corrected AUROC of .78 (95% CI, .70-.86) in the full cohort. The five models showed AUROCs ranging from .70 to .81, with overlapping confidence intervals. Per 1-standard deviation increase, the follow-up S/F ratio (odds ratio [OR], 0.20; 95% CI, 0.07-0.58) and arterial pH (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.86) were independent predictors of HFNC failure, whereas norepinephrine use was not (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 0.37-19.50).
conclusionIntegrating early oxygenation response with acid-base status may assist in the bedside stratification of HFNC failure risk in AHF. Standard logistic regression using these prespecified parameters may offer an interpretable alternative to machine learning models, although it did not outperform the follow-up S/F ratio alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.