Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42680216›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean biological nursing science2026

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Knowledge Test (K-PICS-KT): a methodological study.

Jiyoon Kang, Hyosung Cha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean biological nursing science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiyoon KangSeoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Hyosung ChaCollege of Nursing, Eulji University Seongnam Campus, Seongnam, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to develop the Korean version of the Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Knowledge Test (K-PICS-KT) through cross-cultural adaptation to ensure cultural and clinical appropriateness for use in Korea and to evaluate its validity and reliability.

methodsThe Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Knowledge Test (PICS-KT) was translated into Korean through a cross-cultural adaptation process based on the World Health Organization guidelines for instrument translation and adaptation, with consideration of the Korean cultural and clinical context. The preliminary K-PICS-KT was then evaluated for validity and reliability. Validity evidence was examined using known-groups validity and item analysis. Reliability was evaluated by assessing internal consistency with the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) and temporal stability with a test-retest design.

resultsContent validity assessment produced a preliminary K-PICS-KT comprising 54 items across four domains. Known-groups validity was supported (p < .001). During item analysis, one item was removed because of a low item-total correlation and content review, resulting in a final K-PICS-KT comprising 53 items across four domains. The KR-20 coefficient was .97, and the test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was .94. Evidence supporting content validity, known-groups validity, item discrimination, internal consistency reliability, and test-retest reliability was established.

conclusionThe K-PICS-KT developed in this study can be used to measure PICS knowledge among intensive care unit nurses, develop educational programs to improve knowledge, and evaluate the effectiveness of PICS education programs.

Indexed as

KnowledgePostintensive care syndromePsychometricsSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42680216
PMCPMC13533610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.