Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42680105›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2026

Mass Spectrometry-Based De Novo Sequencing of N-Glycosylated Light Chains: Linking Urinary Proteoforms to In Situ Renal Amyloid Deposits.

Yueyue Zhu, Xin Wang, Xinyue Zhou, Shuang Wang, Peifeng Ji, Zidi Yan, Kai Chen, Xiaojuan Yu, Gang Liu, Li Yang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yueyue ZhuLaboratory of Electron Microscopy, Pathological Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Renal Pathological Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xin WangRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Renal Pathological Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xinyue ZhouCollege of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Shuang WangLaboratory of Electron Microscopy, Pathological Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Renal Pathological Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Peifeng JiOmics Technology Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zidi YanResearch Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Kai ChenLaboratory of Electron Microscopy, Pathological Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Renal Pathological Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaojuan YuRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Renal Pathological Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Gang LiuRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Renal Pathological Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Li YangRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Renal Pathological Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yi LiuKey Laboratory of Combinatorial Biosynthesis and Drug Discovery, Ministry of Education, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: liuyi2013@whu.edu.cn.
Suxia WangLaboratory of Electron Microscopy, Pathological Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Renal Pathological Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: suxiawang@bjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is characterized by clonal immunoglobulin-secreting cells that produce a monoclonal light chain prone to misfolding and amyloid fibril formation in tissues. Understanding its molecular basis requires accurate full-length sequencing of amyloidogenic light chains and linkage of circulating light chains to renal deposits. Achieving this is technically challenging because the low abundance and N-glycosylation of amyloidogenic light chains can complicate protein purification and peptide-level sequence analysis. To address these challenges, we implemented a robust analytical pipeline that integrates intact-mass measurement by Q-TOF MS before and after deglycosylation with multi-protease digestion and de novo peptide sequencing to systematically characterize urinary N-glycosylated light chains. Mass shifts observed before and after deglycosylation supported the presence of N-glycosylation, whereas deglycosylated intact masses were used to constrain full-length sequence assembly. The assembled urinary light-chain sequences were subsequently compared with matched renal amyloid proteomes isolated by laser microdissection and analyzed by bottom-up liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Enzymatic deglycosylation reduced glycan-induced spectral interference. Eight monoclonal light-chain sequences were assembled from urinary light chains, including five derived from the immunoglobulin kappa variable 1 (IGKV1), two from the immunoglobulin lambda variable 2 (IGLV2), and one from IGKV4. The close agreement between theoretical and experimental intact masses confirmed the accuracy and completeness of sequence assembly. In each renal amyloid proteome, the corresponding urine-derived sequence had the highest score among light-chain identifications of the patient's clinically determined isotype (κ or λ) and showed 87.6% to 100% variable-region peptide coverage. Together, these findings support urinary N-glycosylated monoclonal light chains as the precursor proteins of the corresponding renal amyloid fibrils. In conclusion, we have demonstrated a robust workflow that applies established de novo peptide sequencing to characterize urinary N-glycosylated light chains and trace the corresponding sequences in renal amyloid deposits, with potential applications across light chain-related diseases.

Indexed as

AL amyloidosisde novo sequencingfree light chainsmass spectrometryN-glycosylation

Identifiers

PMID42680105
PMCPMC13635717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.