Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42679896›Full record

ArticleTumour virus research2026

HPV integration as a triage tool for HPV-positive women in cervical cancer screening.

Xite Lin, Yue Wang, Nan Yu, Dingjie Wang, Liang Wang, Xiaoyuan Huang, Binhua Dong, Pengming Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour virus research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xite LinLaboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China; College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Women and Children's Critical Diseases Research, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China; Fujian Clinical Research Center for Gynecological Oncology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China.
Yue WangLaboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China; College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Women and Children's Critical Diseases Research, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China; Fujian Clinical Research Center for Gynecological Oncology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China.
Nan YuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095, Jiefang Road, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China.
Dingjie WangLaboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China; College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Women and Children's Critical Diseases Research, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China; Fujian Clinical Research Center for Gynecological Oncology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China.
Liang WangDepartment of Gynecology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China.
Xiaoyuan HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. Electronic address: huangxy@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn.
Binhua DongLaboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China; College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Women and Children's Critical Diseases Research, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China; Fujian Clinical Research Center for Gynecological Oncology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China. Electronic address: dongbinhua86@fjmu.edu.cn.
Pengming SunLaboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China; College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Women and Children's Critical Diseases Research, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China; Fujian Clinical Research Center for Gynecological Oncology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China. Electronic address: sunfemy@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective triage of HPV-positive women remains challenging, as conventional cytology often yields excessive colposcopy referrals due to limited specificity. We evaluated HPV integration status-a key molecular marker associated with cervical carcinogenesis-as a novel triage biomarker within the Fujian-Hubei Screening Cohort (N = 31,628). Among 949 prospectively enrolled HPV-positive women with concurrent HPV integration testing (HIVID), genotyping, and cytology, HPV integration emerged as the strongest independent predictor of CIN3+ (aOR = 68.1). As a standalone triage tool, HPV integration detection significantly outperformed cytology, demonstrating superior specificity (97.0% vs. 64.3%; p < 0.001) and PPV (57.1% vs. 10.4%; p < 0.001) while maintaining comparable sensitivity (66.7% vs. 68.5%). Critically, our combined strategy integrating HPV16/18 genotyping with integration detection achieved optimized performance: it enhanced specificity by 25.2% (69.5% vs. 44.3%) and yielded a higher PPV (14.7% vs. 9.1%) compared to standard cytology + genotyping, with no significant sensitivity loss (87.0% vs. 92.6%; p = 0.526). This approach identified a large low-risk subgroup (NILM/integration-negative; 59.2% of cohort) with minimal CIN3+ risk (0.7%), enabling an 82% reduction in colposcopy referrals versus cytology triage (6.6% vs. 37.6%; p < 0.001). These results position HPV integration as a robust biomarker for precision risk stratification. The combined use of HPV genotyping and integration detection offers an efficient, clinically actionable strategy to minimize unnecessary procedures while maintaining high-grade lesion detection.

Indexed as

Cervical cancer screeningHPV integrationHuman papillomavirus (HPV)Precision medicineTriage

Identifiers

PMID42679896
PMCPMC13571999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.