ReviewThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2026
US postmarketed drug removals: Analysis of discontinued and withdrawn drugs.
Review in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of marketing authorizations, withdrawals, and refusals by the European Medicines Agency (EMA): trends in approval procedures 1995-2025.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drugs removed from the US market after approval can be either discontinued by the manufacturer or withdrawn by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, a systematic overview is currently lacking. This minireview provides a comprehensive analysis of removed drugs, identifies patterns regarding drug classes, indications, adverse effects, and scientific interest, and compares US removals with the European Union and FDA boxed warnings. A total of 166 drugs were removed between 1955 and 2026, including 88 discontinued and 78 withdrawn drugs. Removed drugs represented a wide range of therapeutic fields, with certain drug classes occurring repeatedly, particularly cyclooxygenase inhibitors and fluoroquinolones. Market removals were frequently associated with serious adverse effects such as hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and hematologic toxicity. The prominent drug classes and adverse effect categories also occurred frequently among drugs carrying boxed warnings. While withdrawn drugs were typically banned by the FDA because of severe safety concerns, discontinued drugs were often removed because of commercial decisions or obsolescence, sometimes in combination with safety considerations. The analysis of publication peaks showed that for most drugs, scientific interest peaked before market removal, while in other cases, publication peaks occurred around or after withdrawal, indicating renewed scientific interest. Drug removals from the US market represent a heterogeneous group of drugs, indications, and underlying causes. While withdrawals and discontinuations differ in their regulatory implications, they share overlapping characteristics and safety considerations. Integration of European Union availability and FDA boxed warning comparisons highlights international differences and patterns requiring precautionary attention, with recurring drug classes and adverse effects. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This minireview provides a comprehensive overview of US postmarketing drug removals, covering drugs and causes, as well as evaluating and comparing their characteristics. Patterns and characteristics are identified and compared between discontinued and withdrawn drugs. The analysis of publication peaks and the derived patterns allow an evaluation of changes in scientific interest. This analysis provides information on past drug safety decisions and guides future risk-benefit assessments, while identifying prevalent drug classes and adverse effects that require precaution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.