ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Physical activity and cognitive performance: cross-sectional analysis of the Brazilian longitudinal study of adult health (ELSA-Brazil).
Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEvidence on the relationship between Leisure-Time Physical Activity (LTPA), Commuting Physical Activity (CPA), and cognitive performance is inconsistent.
objectiveTo examine the associations between LTPA, CPA, and cognitive performance in adults from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA‒Brazil).
methodsThis cross-sectional analysis included 13,340 participants (median age 51 years; 54.5% women). Physical Activity (PA) was assessed using the long-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire, including LTPA and CPA. Cognitive performance was measured by word memory, verbal fluency, and the Trail Making Test Part B. Z-scores were computed for each test, and a global cognitive score was derived as their mean. Linear regression models estimated associations between PA levels and cognitive performance after multivariable adjustment, including occupational status. Analyses were stratified by sex and conducted in the overall sample.
resultsLTPA inactivity was associated with lower scores for verbal fluency (β = -0.07; 95% CI: -0.10 to -0.04), executive function (β = -0.10; 95% CI: -0.13 to -0.06), and global cognition (β = -0.06; 95% CI: -0.08 to -0.03). CPA inactivity showed associations in the opposite direction, with higher executive function (β = 0.08; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.12) and memory in men (β=0.05; 95% CI: 0.001 to 0.10). After adjustment for occupational status, CPA associations attenuated and lost significance.
conclusionIn this cross-sectional study, the relationship between PA and cognition differed by domain. LTPA was associated with better cognitive scores, while CPA showed non-favorable or null associations after adjustment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.