Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42679344›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Refining and Assessing Gender-Tailored Group Therapy for Veteran Men With Military Sexual Trauma: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

Jonathan Yahalom, Erin P Finley, Sheila O'Brien, Brandon C Yarns, Lindsey L Monteith, Ariel J Lang, Alison B Hamilton

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan YahalomHealth Services Research, US Department of Veterans Affairs, 11301 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90073, United States, 1 310 478 3711.ORCID 0000-0002-5444-1878
Erin P FinleyCentral Texas Veterans Healthcare System, Temple, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4497-7721
Sheila O'BrienCentral Texas Veterans Healthcare System, Temple, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8156-1488
Brandon C YarnsHealth Services Research, US Department of Veterans Affairs, 11301 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90073, United States, 1 310 478 3711.ORCID 0000-0003-3428-3435
Lindsey L MonteithVA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center for Suicide Prevention, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8104-5280
Ariel J LangCenter of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, US Department of Veterans Affairs, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2468-115X
Alison B HamiltonHealth Services Research, US Department of Veterans Affairs, 11301 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90073, United States, 1 310 478 3711.ORCID 0000-0003-3998-7212

Funding

RRD VA IK2 RX003495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Military sexual trauma (MST) among veteran men is common, underreported, and associated with substantial psychological morbidity. Despite evidence that gender-related distress and shame pertaining to masculinity contribute to treatment avoidance and dropout, MST interventions within the US Department of Veterans Affairs have not been developed specifically for men. Objective: The objective of this study is to develop a gender-tailored group psychotherapy for veteran men with histories of MST. Guided by implementation science frameworks, the mixed methods study described in this paper proposes to iteratively refine the previously implemented Men's MST Group (MMG), a 12-session, gender-tailored, trauma-focused group intervention that integrates dynamic group processes, mindfulness-informed distress tolerance, and psychoeducation. Methods: We draw on a synthesis of the intervention mapping framework and the access reconceptualization model to identify patient and system characteristics that contribute to treatment access and engagement. For aim 1, we will refine MMG through focus groups, qualitative interviews, and expert consultation. For aim 2, we will pilot-test MMG in a randomized controlled trial (n=32) comparing MMG to present-centered group therapy. For aim 3, we will evaluate implementation barriers and facilitators and iteratively refine the intervention through posttreatment qualitative interviews and expert panel review. Results: This study was funded with a start date of January 2025 and is anticipated to end in December 2029. As of July 2026, we have completed data collection for aim 1 and are currently analyzing data from 31 semistructured interviews. As of July 2026, we are also refining the MMG treatment protocol, which we plan to implement in a pilot randomized controlled trial in January 2027. Results of aim 1 are anticipated to be published in 2027. Participant recruitment for the aim 2 pilot trials has not begun. Conclusions: The goal of the current project is to refine and pilot-test a gender-tailored group psychotherapy for veteran men with histories of MST. We anticipate that the intervention will demonstrate feasibility, acceptability, and implementation potential because it was developed through an iterative process incorporating feedback from veterans, clinicians, and subject matter experts. Should study objectives be met, the next step will be to conduct a fully powered randomized controlled multisite trial. We additionally plan to disseminate findings regarding treatment needs, preferences, and barriers to care among men with histories of MST, which may inform future treatment development and implementation efforts beyond the current project.

Indexed as

Military Sexual TraumaPsychotherapy, GroupVeteransHumansMaleMen's Health ServicesPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchResearch DesignUnited Statesclinical trial designgroup therapymilitary sexual traumatreatment protocolveteran men

Identifiers

PMID42679344
PMCPMC13533415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.