Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42679306›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2026

Evaluating the Influence of MCAT Scores on Medical Student Selection and Performance Using a Machine Learning Approach: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Michele Cherfane, Marc Ghanem, Georges Choueiry, Selim M Nasser, Tamina Elias-Rizk, Sola Aoun Bahous

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michele CherfaneGilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Blat, PO box 36 Byblos, Byblos, Byblos, 4501, Lebanon, +961 1 786456 ext. 2336.ORCID 0000-0002-6438-0159
Marc GhanemGilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Blat, PO box 36 Byblos, Byblos, Byblos, 4501, Lebanon, +961 1 786456 ext. 2336.ORCID 0000-0002-7479-7994
Georges ChoueiryGilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Blat, PO box 36 Byblos, Byblos, Byblos, 4501, Lebanon, +961 1 786456 ext. 2336.ORCID 0000-0003-1456-9292
Selim M NasserGilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Blat, PO box 36 Byblos, Byblos, Byblos, 4501, Lebanon, +961 1 786456 ext. 2336.ORCID 0000-0002-9334-9847
Tamina Elias-RizkGilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Blat, PO box 36 Byblos, Byblos, Byblos, 4501, Lebanon, +961 1 786456 ext. 2336.ORCID 0000-0003-3666-8312
Sola Aoun BahousGilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Blat, PO box 36 Byblos, Byblos, Byblos, 4501, Lebanon, +961 1 786456 ext. 2336.ORCID 0000-0002-7159-7559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) has been central to medical school admissions in North America, though its necessity in holistic selection processes remains debated. The COVID-19 pandemic's suspension of MCAT testing sessions allowed institutions to explore alternative admission criteria. Additionally, global challenges in test administration underscore the vulnerability of systems dependent on a single standardized test. Objective: This study aimed to (1) assess whether including MCAT scores in admissions decisions improves the prediction of medical school performance compared with grade point average (GPA) and interview-based selection and (2) evaluate whether machine learning (ML) can generate viable MCAT score predictions when testing is unavailable. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1898 applicants to the Lebanese American University School of Medicine (2009-2023). Among 349 admitted students with MCAT scores, we compared admission composites including vs excluding the MCAT in relation to academic outcomes (Med 1-4 final grades) and clinical performance (Med 1-2 objective structured clinical examination [OSCE] scores). Students were stratified into tertiles to examine tier-specific effects. To model an MCAT alternative, we trained an ensemble ML model (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, kernel ridge, gradient boosting, elastic net, and light gradient boosting machine [LightGBM]) using data from 1583 applicants (2009-2020) to predict MCAT scores from cumulative GPA, core GPA, interview scores, merit points, and honors participation. The model was validated on 315 applicants admitted during the MCAT suspension (2021-2023), and its impact on admission rankings and performance correlations was evaluated. Results: Including the MCAT in the admissions composite did not meaningfully improve prediction of overall academic performance ( Conclusions: Within this single-institution study, MCAT scores provided limited incremental validity for predicting academic performance and reduced prediction of clinical skills. ML-based predictions of MCAT scores introduced sufficient error to affect admissions decisions, supporting a robust holistic admissions process during temporary MCAT disruptions while highlighting the need for validation across diverse institutional settings before broader generalization.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceCollege Admission TestMachine LearningSchool Admission CriteriaStudents, MedicalEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMalePredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesSchools, Medicalmachine learningMCATMedical College Admission Testmedical school admissionmedical school performancestudent selection

Identifiers

PMID42679306
PMCPMC13533314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.