ReviewJournal of medicinal chemistry2026
Accelerate Your Science: Direct-to-Biology Strategies in Medicinal Chemistry.
Review in Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Direct-to-biology (D2B) is a powerful strategy that accelerates early drug discovery. It enables compounds to be synthesized in miniaturized formats and evaluated directly as crude reaction mixtures. This bypasses the need for purification during the initial design-make-test cycle. Advances in robust synthetic methodologies, automation, reaction miniaturization, and biological screening have transformed D2B from a proof-of-concept approach into a versatile medicinal chemistry platform. This platform is applicable to fragment optimization, covalent ligands, macrocycles, proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs), molecular glues, and cellular phenotypic screening. This perspective focuses on the synthetic transformations, assay technologies, and platform implementations that drive modern D2B workflows. It emphasizes reaction robustness, assay compatibility, and practical implementation. Analysis of the current literature revealed that D2B is more governed by reaction reliability than synthetic diversity. Amide coupling and click chemistry dominate reported workflows, while more complex transformations remain underexplored. We discuss the complementary strengths and limitations of biochemical, biophysical, and cellular readouts, identify current bottlenecks in reaction scope and data management, and highlight emerging opportunities arising from reaction miniaturization, machine learning, automated experimentation, and advanced synthetic methodologies. Rather than replacing conventional medicinal chemistry, D2B fundamentally shifts experimental effort from purification toward early biological validation and is poised to become an integral component of future medicinal chemistry workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.