ArticlePloS one2026
Strategies to improve outcomes of obstetric emergencies in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObstetric emergencies remain a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) despite increased access to facility-based deliveries and emergency obstetric care. Improving outcomes requires not only life-saving clinical interventions but also effective health system strategies. This review mapped published evidence on strategies used to improve outcomes of obstetric emergencies in SSA.
objectiveThis scoping review aimed to identify strategies reported in the literature to improve outcomes of obstetric emergencies in SSA.
methodsThe review was reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR. A comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and CORE identified studies published between January 2019 and December 2025. Eligible studies focused on strategies to improve outcomes for pregnant women experiencing obstetric emergencies in sub-Saharan Africa and were published in English. Data were extracted using a standardized data-extraction tool and descriptively mapped through thematic analysis to identify the range and characteristics of strategies reported across studies.
resultsOf the 728 records identified, 64 studies met the inclusion criteria. The identified strategies were organised into four interrelated themes. Three themes described strategies to improve outcomes of obstetric emergencies: (1) life-saving clinical and health system interventions, including pharmacological therapies, monitoring and triage tools, and service-strengthening initiatives; (2) health workforce education, training, and mentorship, which improved provider competence and selected process outcomes but showed variable effects on maternal mortality; and (3) health system organisation, referral mechanisms, and policy implementation, including emergency obstetric care protocols, referral coordination, and service decentralisation. A fourth theme described contextual factors influencing the implementation and effectiveness of these strategies, including infrastructure limitations, resource constraints, workforce shortages, and delays in accessing care.
conclusionImproving outcomes of obstetric emergencies in sub-Saharan Africa requires integrated, context-responsive strategies that combine evidence-based clinical interventions with strengthened health systems. This review demonstrates that effective obstetric emergency care depends not only on life-saving clinical management but also on coordinated referral systems, a competent and supported health workforce, functional health system organization, and enabling implementation contexts. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness, scalability, and sustainability of integrated strategies across diverse resource-constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.