ArticlePloS one2026
Physically aligned forest fire risk prediction: A deep learning framework coupling fuel and climate multivariate factors.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing forest fire risk prediction methods often focus on single-element analysis, which makes it difficult to effectively capture the underlying mechanisms of the "fuel-climate" interaction. This paper proposes a physically aligned prediction framework named FWI-MSNet. Using 18 years of synchronized observation data from the Huitong Ecological Station in China, the framework constructs a multi-scale feature system, selecting 21 physically relevant key features, including core indicators of the Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI). A parallel multiscale 1-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1D-CNN) extracts dynamic features across multiple temporal scales (from daily to seasonal). Subsequently, a synergistic mechanism integrating Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) and Transformer achieves deep integration of temporal evolution and global correlation. Experimental results demonstrate that compared to seven baseline models (including XGBoost, LSTM, CNN, and four ablation variants), the mean of RMSE, MAE, and MAPE decreases by 56.1%, and R2 improves from 0.223 (baseline average) to 0.9251. Furthermore, it accurately captures the trajectory of fire risk evolution in the 2020 catastrophic forest fires in Australia. This study provides a valuable reference for forest fire risk prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.