ArticlePloS one2026
Theta burst stimulation of the visual cortex does not alter contrast sensitivity under optically induced blur.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated whether a single session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), specifically theta burst stimulation (TBS), acutely modulates visual function under conditions of induced optical defocus. Twelve adults with normal or corrected-to-normal vision participated in a pre-registered, within-subject, double-blind, sham-controlled study. Participants first adapted to an experimentally induced + 1.50D optical blur for 10 minutes. Following this, stimulation was applied to the primary visual cortex according to a pre-randomised allocation. Stimulation consisted of continuous TBS (cTBS), intermittent TBS (iTBS), or sham stimulation, with each condition applied to all participants over separate visits. Visual acuity (VA) and contrast discrimination thresholds were measured under the induced blur condition immediately before and after stimulation. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed no significant interaction between stimulation condition and time for either contrast discrimination threshold (F(2,22) = 0.03, p = 0.96, partial ηp² = 0.003) or VA (F(2,22) = 0.12, p = 0.88, partial ηp² = 0.011). Although a significant main effect of time was observed for VA (F(1,11) = 6.30, p = 0.029, partial ηp² = 0.364), reflecting an improvement across all conditions, there were no differential effects attributable to active cTBS or iTBS compared to sham. Consequently, a single session of TBS applied to the visual cortex did not result in a measurable modulation of visual performance under acute optical defocus in adults with typical vision. Rapid homeostatic mechanisms activated during short-term blur adaptation may reduce the susceptibility of the visual cortex to the acute effects of TBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.